Support and method of shaping workpiece and support

ABSTRACT

A support for supporting a workpiece from below efficiently while reducing the amount of necessary materials, and a shaping method for shaping the workpiece and support efficiently includes a hollow state support for supporting a workpiece from below, and the hollow state support has a lattice form with crossing of straight linear or curved columnar bodies, wherein a sintered strength at a connecting region with the workpiece is lower than the sintered strength at the other regions.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Technical Field

The present invention relates to a support that supports a workpiecewhich is to be produced by a three-dimensional shaping system, and to amethod of shaping the workpiece and the support.

BACKGROUND ART

A support for supporting a workpiece that is to be worked from belowwith a tool or the like differs in its shape and size according to theshape and size of the workpiece, and once working of the workpiece hasbeen completed, it is removed from the workpiece and disposed away.

In the prior art, however, columnar or tubular shapes are employed assupports for the most part, as a construction exhibiting excess strengthbeyond what is necessary for support from below the workpiece.

Consequently, multiple tools and special machines must necessarily beused for disposal, which requires a great amount of additional labor.

Moreover, excessively strong supports incur needless material costs,which is disadvantageous in terms of production cost.

Patent Document 1 describes a method for producing a three-dimensionalobject, wherein a support structure 21 on the lower end is divided intoa core region 22 and an external capsule 23 serving as a connectingregion, with softer irradiation during solidification of the externalcapsule 23 by laser light ([FIG. 2], p.8, lines 20-21, p.9, line 3).

However, the core region 22 shown in FIG. 2 of the aforementionedpublication has a material-filled structure, and this has necessitatedexcessive material cost.

In regard to the aforementioned core region 22, Patent Document 1states: “It is solidified in separate distant partial regions. Eachregion is either completely unconnected, or connected via a connectingweb.” (p.8, lines 5 to 4 from bottom), thereby disclosing the structureother than the filled structure, but this description is unclear anddoes not concretely specify the structure of the core region 22.

Patent Document 2 discloses the construction of a lattice-like supportstructure with thin sheets mutually crossing at a specified angle (FIG.9, claim 2, p.3, lower left column, line 3 from bottom to lower rightcolumn, line 1 from top).

However, Patent Document 2 does not disclose or suggest in any way therelationship between the strength at the connecting region between thesupport structure and the object to be supported above, and the strengthat the other regions.

PRIOR ART DOCUMENTS Patent Documents

Patent Document 1: Japanese Announced Unexamined Patent Application No.H09-511705A

Patent Document 2: Japanese Published Unexamined Patent Application No.H03-136834A

SUMMARY OF INVENTION Problem to be Solved

An object of the present invention is providing a support for supportinga workpiece from below efficiently with reducing the amount of necessarymaterials, and providing a shaping method for shaping the workpiece andsupport efficiently. [Solution for Problem]

In order to solve the aforementioned problems, the present invention hasthe following basic features.

(1) A combination comprising:

a workpiece,

a hollow state support for supporting the workpiece from below, thehollow state support comprising a lattice form with one of a) straightlinear columnar bodies, b) curved columnar bodies or c) both straightlinear columnar bodies and curved columnar bodies crossing each other,and

a notch formed horizontally at or near a top end of the hollow statesupport for inserting fingers of an operator when the support is to becut off from the workpiece, the notch being positioned above a pluralityof adjacent vertically oriented support members of the hollow statesupport,

wherein a sintered strength at a connecting region of the hollow statesupport with the workpiece is lower than a sintered strength at otherregions of the hollow state support, and

wherein a degree of sintering of each layer of the hollow state supportis lower than a degree of sintering of each layer in the workpiece.

(2) A combination comprising:

a workpiece,

a hollow state support for supporting the workpiece from below, thehollow state support comprising a lattice form with one of a) straightlinear columnar bodies, b) curved columnar bodies or c) both straightlinear columnar bodies and curved columnar bodies crossing each other,and

a notch formed horizontally at or near a top end of the hollow statesupport for inserting fingers of an operator when the support is to becut off from the workpiece, the notch being positioned above a pluralityof adjacent vertically oriented support members of the hollow statesupport,

wherein said hollow state support includes a connecting region whichconnects the hollow state support with the workpiece, wherein a sinteredstrength at the connecting region is lower than a sintered strength atother regions of the hollow state support,

wherein a degree of sintering of at least one powder layer of theconnecting region formed between a top end of the support and a bottomend of the workpiece is lower than a degree of sintering at other lowerside shaping regions of the support, and

wherein a degree of sintering of each layer of the hollow state supportis lower than a degree of sintering of each layer in the workpiece.

(3) A combination comprising:

a workpiece,

a hollow state support for supporting the workpiece from below, thehollow state support comprising a lattice form with one of a) straightlinear columnar bodies, b) curved columnar bodies or c) both straightlinear columnar bodies and curved columnar bodies crossing each other,and

a notch formed horizontally at or near a top end of the hollow statesupport for inserting fingers of an operator when the support is to becut off from the workpiece, the notch being positioned above a pluralityof adjacent vertically oriented support members of the hollow statesupport,

wherein said hollow state support includes a connecting region whichconnects the hollow state support with the workpiece, wherein a sinteredstrength at the connecting region is lower than a sintered strength atother regions of the hollow state support,

wherein sintering is omitted in only some powder layers among theplurality of powder layers of the connecting region formed between a topend of the support and a bottom end of the workpiece, and

wherein a degree of sintering of each layer of the hollow state supportis lower than a degree of sintering of each layer in the workpiece.

Advantageous Effects of Invention

In the basic construction (1), the support is hollow, whereby the loadof the workpiece is distributed in an essentially uniform state so thatboth bearing of the load and economy of materials is achieved.

It may be apparently grounded by the fact that the columnar bodiesforming the lattice form according to basic construction (1) does nothave a thin sheet in-between as in Patent Document 2.

Furthermore, since the sintered strength in the region in contact withthe workpiece is lower than in the other regions, it is possible toeasily cut off the support of the columnar bodies from the workpiece.

According to basic construction (2), it is possible to efficientlyaccomplish the operation of employing a three-dimensional shaping systemand shaping the workpiece and the support of basic construction (1) atthe same time.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a lateral cross-sectional view showing an embodiment thatemploys a lattice form created by crossing of columnar bodies, as thehollow form of the support of basic construction (1), wherein FIG. 1(a)shows a case of a lattice form in which each lattice section isobliquely crossing with the vertical direction, FIG. 1(b) shows a caseof a lattice form in which portions coincide with the vertical directionand the remaining portions are perpendicular to that direction, and FIG.1(c) shows a case of a lattice form in which each lattice section is inthe vertical direction at the bottom end and, due to successive curving,is in the horizontal direction at the top end.

FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view in the vertical direction, for anembodiment of a support with a lattice form according to basicconstruction (1), wherein the surface that is to support the workpieceis formed at the top end.

FIG. 3 is a lateral cross-sectional view, for an embodiment of theshaping method of basic construction (2) wherein a support with alattice form is shaped.

Note that the dotted lines indicate the state of control datatransmission from a controller to different operating parts.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

To compare again the construction of basic construction (1) and alattice form produced by crossing the thin sheet-like supports describedin Patent Document 2 (hereunder referred to as “thin sheet-like latticeform”), if it is considered that the linear crossing portions of thethin sheet-like lattice form exhibit the necessary indispensablefunction for supporting a weight while preventing their own deformation,the columnar lattice form employed by basic construction (1) isevaluated as a structure in which the region of the thin sheet itself isabstracted from the thin sheet-like lattice form, selecting linearcrossing sections that support a weight while preventing deformation.

By thus abstracting the region of the thin sheet itself while selectinglinear crossing sections from the lattice form, it is possible toachieve both support of the load of the workpiece 2 and reduction inmaterials.

In the case of a columnar lattice form, it is common to employ anembodiment with a uniform thickness, as shown in FIGS. 1(a), (b) and(c).

In this embodiment, the cross-sectional area of each region does notchange, it is possible to avoid the excessive use of material forformation of extra regions with insignificant and unnecessarythicknesses, resulting from the use of prescribed thicknesses for smallsections that is necessary to prevent breakage caused by concentrationof strain at sections with small cross-sectional areas when thethickness is not uniform.

In basic construction (1), for an embodiment in which thecross-sectional area in the horizontal direction gradually increasestoward the lower side, it is possible to prevent overturning of thesupport 1 even when the location supporting the workpiece 2 is high, andthis likewise applies to the lattice forms of FIGS. 1(a), (b) and (c).

FIG. 1(a) shows the state of an embodiment wherein each lattice sectionis set in a slanted direction with respect to the vertical directionalong the direction in which the workpiece 2 is supported.

As shown in FIG. 1(a), vertical lattice sections are set crossing witheach lattice section at the horizontal ends, and horizontal latticesections are set crossing with each lattice section at the lower end,thereby allowing stable support of the workpiece 2 to be achieved, andthis likewise applies for the embodiment shown in FIG. 1(c).

In the case of a lattice form obliquely crossing with the verticaldirection, a bending moment M is generated in each cross-section of thelattice form due to the load of the workpiece 2, and if the curvatureradius with bending by bending moment M is represented as ρ, then thefollowing basic general formula is valid:ρ=(EI)/M  [Formula 1](where E is the modulus of longitudinal elasticity, or Young's modulus,and I is the secondary moment of the cross-section).

As clearly seen from this general formula, in order to reducedeformation with a larger value for the curvature radius ρ, a materialmay be selected having a cross-sectional shape (specifically, across-sectional circular shape) with a large Young's modulus E and alarge secondary moment I.

Such a material is selected based on whether, in concreteexperimentation using lattice-shaped supports 1 conforming to differentworkpieces 2, the support 1 does not only not break but also essentiallydoes not deform.

FIG. 1(b) shows the state of an embodiment in which sections of eachlattice match the vertical direction along the direction in which theworkpiece 2 is supported, and the remaining sections are perpendicularto the vertical direction.

For this embodiment, if the load of the workpiece 2 acting on thecross-section of each lattice form is represented as F and the length ofdisplacement in the vertical direction at the top end of thecross-section of the lattice form is represented as x, then thefollowing basic general formula is valid:F/S=E(x/L)  [Formula 2](where S is the cross-sectional area, E is the Young's modulus and L isthe length of the support in the vertical direction).

As clearly seen from this general formula, in order to reduce x whichrepresents the degree of deformation, a material may be selected havinga high Young's modulus for a given cross-sectional area S.

FIG. 1(c) shows an embodiment set so that each lattice section isvertically oriented at the bottom end, and successively curves to changeorientation horizontally at the top end.

In this embodiment, at the lower end and its vicinity, displacementoccurs according to the general formula of [Formula 2] above, while theother regions resolve to a bending moment M according to the generalformula of [Formula 1] above.

In the case of this embodiment, the support 1 may support the workpiece2 in a pressure-resistant state at the lower end and its vicinity, whileat the upper end, it may support the workpiece 2 in a stable manner bythe horizontal lattice sections.

Such a material is selected based on whether, in concreteexperimentation using lattice-shaped supports 1 conforming to differentworkpieces 2, the support 1 does not only not break but also essentiallydoes not deform.

From the viewpoint of convenience of removing the support 1 in basicconstruction (1), as shown in FIG. 1(a), an embodiment may be employedwherein a notch 11 for inserting the operator's fingers when cutting thesupport 1 off from the workpiece 2, is provided horizontally at or nearthe top end of the lattice form.

In the case of this embodiment, the operator inserts his/her own handinto the notch 11 to allow smooth removal of the support 1 from theworkpiece 2.

When the lattice form extends up to the top end of the support 1 inbasic construction (1), support of the workpiece 2 may be unstable.

Considering such conditions, basic construction (1) may employ anembodiment in which a flat surface or curved surface 14 for supportingthe workpiece 2 is formed at the top end of the lattice form, as shownin FIG. 2 (a flat surface is shown in FIG. 2).

When the workpiece 2 has been situated on the flat surface or curvedsurface 14, the support 1 supports the workpiece 2 in a stable manner.

In the shaping method according to basic construction (2), as shown inFIG. 3, a three-dimensional shaping system is employed and the workpiece2 is shaped in the upper region, while the support 1 of basicconstruction (1) is shaped in the lower region.

In this three-dimensional shaping system, similar to a commonthree-dimensional shaping system, a laser beam or electron beam supply5, a scanner 6, a powder supply tool 7, a squeegee 8, a table 9 and acontroller 10 are employed as essential constituent elements.

Normally, the shape of the support 1 at each height position is designedfor shaping by a CAM system or CAE system to adapt the shape and load ofthe workpiece 2.

When the shape is specifically designed using a CAM system or CAEsystem, the most suitable shape to adapt the shape and load of a givenworkpiece 2 is selected based on previously accumulated data.

However, when the shape at different heights is to be designed adaptinga new shape and load of a workpiece 2, the nearest data and the shape ofthe support 1 at different heights corresponding to those data areselected from the previously accumulated data of workpiece 2 shape andload, and a program is employed that corrects the dimensions of theshape at different height positions selected as described above, basedon proportional distribution using the proportion between the two setsof data, to allow further automatic design.

An embodiment may of course be employed in which the notch 11 shown inFIG. 1(a) is also designed by a CAM system or CAE system.

With basic construction (2) using a CAM and CAE system, therefore, it ispossible to very efficiently shape the support 1.

Similar to the requirement for selection of the material composing theworkpiece 2 to adapt the function of the workpiece 2, a suitablematerial is also preferably selected for the support 1 as well, forsupport of the workpiece 2.

In basic construction (2), an appropriate material may be selected toadapt the thickness of the support 1 and the direction at each heightposition.

The support 1 and workpiece 2 will naturally differ in the properties ofthe necessary materials.

That is, since the strength required per unit volume is lower for thesupport 1 than for the workpiece 2, an embodiment may be employed inwhich the degree of sintering of the support 1 is lower than the degreeof sintering of the workpiece 2.

A specific method for obtaining different degrees of sintering for thispurpose may be selected from among:

(1) a method of setting the thickness of the support 1 to be larger thanthe thickness of the workpiece 2 at each laminating unit 4,

(2) a method of using the same thickness for the laminating units 4, andsetting the radiation dose of the laser beam or electron beam per unitarea for the support 1 to be lower than for the workpiece 2, and

(3) a method of setting the thicknesses of the laminating units 4 andthe radiation dose per unit area to be the same, while conductingirradiation every several laminating units for the support 1 andconducting irradiation every single laminating unit for the workpiece 2.

Based on this selection, it is possible to select a condition for basicconstruction (2) which does not require as powerful a degree ofsintering for the workpiece 2 as for the support 1, thereby allowingefficient production to be carried out.

A description will be given below according to Examples.

Example 1

As a feature of Example 1, the degree of sintering of one or severalpowder layers formed between the top end of the support 1 and the bottomend of the workpiece 2 is lower than the degree of sintering at theother lower side shaping regions of the support 1.

In Example 1 having this feature, at the stage of completion of thesingle step in which the support 1 and the workpiece 2 have both beenshaped, a region is formed between them wherein the degree of sinteringis lower than the degree of sintering of the support 1, and it ispossible to easily separate the two.

The small degree of sintering referred to here, which is sufficient forthe need, is a degree of sintering that may barely maintain bondingbetween the workpiece 2 and the support 1 without separation betweenthem even when vibration is produced during working of the workpiece 2.

The criteria for setting such a sintered state may only be confirmed byaccumulated experimentation based on trial and error for combinations ofdifferent workpieces 2 and the support 1.

Example 2

As a feature of Example 2, in order to finally achieve the featuredescribed above, sintering is omitted in some of the powder layers amongthe plurality of powder layers formed between the top end of the support1 and the bottom end of the workpiece 2.

Even if sintering is omitted for some of the powder layers, thesintering of the other regions may maintain bonding between theunsintered powder layers, although the degree of bonding is very minimalcompared to that by the actual sintering.

As a result, Example 2 also allows easy separation between the support 1and the workpiece 2.

The region range for the degree to which sintering of some of the powderlayers may be omitted while still allowing maintenance of the bondedstate between the support 1 and the workpiece 2 and easy separation,must also be confirmed by accumulated experimentation based on trial anderror.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

Thus, the present invention achieves both the necessary strength and loweconomic cost for a support that supports a workpiece, while alsocreating efficient production conditions for both workpieces andsupports, and it is therefore of tremendous value in the field ofmachine tools.

REFERENCE SIGNS LIST

-   1: Support-   11: Notch-   14: Flat surface or curved surface-   2: Workpiece-   3: Container-   4: Laminating unit by powder layer-   5: Laser beam or electron beam supply-   6: Scanner-   7: Powder supply tool-   8: Squeegee-   9: Table-   10: Controller

The invention claimed is:
 1. A combination comprising: a workpiece, ahollow state support for supporting the workpiece from below, the hollowstate support comprising a lattice form with one of a) straight linearcolumnar bodies, b) curved columnar bodies or c) both straight linearcolumnar bodies and curved columnar bodies crossing each other, and anotch formed horizontally at or near a top end of the hollow statesupport for inserting fingers of an operator when the support is to becut off from the workpiece, the notch being positioned above a pluralityof adjacent vertically oriented support members of the hollow statesupport, wherein a sintered strength at a connecting region of thehollow state support with the workpiece is lower than a sinteredstrength at other regions of the hollow state support, and wherein adegree of sintering of each layer of the hollow state support is lowerthan a degree of sintering of each layer in the workpiece.
 2. Thecombination according to claim 1, wherein the lattice form created bycrossing of the columnar bodies is one of: a lattice form which is setin a slanted direction with respect to a vertical direction, a latticeform which partially matches the vertical direction while a remainder ofthe lattice form is perpendicular to the vertical direction, and alattice form in which each lattice section is oriented vertically at abottom end thereof and successively curves to change orientationhorizontally at a top end thereof.
 3. The combination according to claim1, wherein a cross-sectional area of the hollow state support measuredin a horizontal direction successively increases toward a lower sidethereof.
 4. The combination according to claim 1, wherein thicknesses ofthe columnar bodies are uniform.
 5. The combination according to claim1, wherein one of a flat surface and a curved surface for supporting aworkpiece is formed at a top end of the hollow state support.
 6. Acombination comprising: a workpiece, a hollow state support forsupporting the workpiece from below, the hollow state support comprisinga lattice form with one of a) straight linear columnar bodies, b) curvedcolumnar bodies or c) both straight linear columnar bodies and curvedcolumnar bodies crossing each other, and a notch formed horizontally ator near a top end of the hollow state support for inserting fingers ofan operator when the support is to be cut off from the workpiece, thenotch being positioned above a plurality of adjacent vertically orientedsupport members of the hollow state support, wherein said hollow statesupport includes a connecting region which connects the hollow statesupport with the workpiece, wherein a sintered strength at theconnecting region is lower than a sintered strength at other regions ofthe hollow state support, wherein a degree of sintering of at least onepowder layer of the connecting region formed between a top end of thesupport and a bottom end of the workpiece is lower than a degree ofsintering at other lower side shaping regions of the support, andwherein a degree of sintering of each layer of the hollow state supportis lower than a degree of sintering of each layer in the workpiece. 7.The combination according to claim 6, wherein the lattice form createdby crossing of the columnar bodies is one of: a lattice form which isset in a slanted direction with respect to a vertical direction, alattice form which partially matches the vertical direction while aremainder of the lattice form is perpendicular to the verticaldirection, and a lattice form in which each lattice section is orientedvertically at a bottom end thereof and successively curves to changeorientation horizontally at a top end thereof.
 8. The combinationaccording to claim 6, wherein a cross-sectional area of the hollow statesupport measured in a horizontal direction successively increases towarda lower side thereof.
 9. The combination according to claim 6, whereinthicknesses of the columnar bodies are uniform.
 10. The combinationaccording to claim 6, wherein one of a flat surface and a curved surfacefor supporting a workpiece is formed at a top end of the hollow statesupport.
 11. A combination comprising: a workpiece, a hollow statesupport for supporting the workpiece from below, the hollow statesupport comprising a lattice form with one of a) straight linearcolumnar bodies, b) curved columnar bodies or c) both straight linearcolumnar bodies and curved columnar bodies crossing each other, and anotch formed horizontally at or near a top end of the hollow statesupport for inserting fingers of an operator when the support is to becut off from the workpiece, the notch being positioned above a pluralityof adjacent vertically oriented support members of the hollow statesupport, wherein said hollow state support includes a connecting regionwhich connects the hollow state support with the workpiece, wherein asintered strength at the connecting region is lower than a sinteredstrength at other regions of the hollow state support, wherein sinteringis omitted in only some powder layers among the plurality of powderlayers of the connecting region formed between a top end of the supportand a bottom end of the workpiece, and wherein a degree of sintering ofeach layer of the hollow state support is lower than a degree ofsintering of each layer in the workpiece.
 12. The combination accordingto claim 11, wherein the lattice form created by crossing of thecolumnar bodies is one of: a lattice form which is set in a slanteddirection with respect to a vertical direction, a lattice form whichpartially matches the vertical direction while a remainder of thelattice form is perpendicular to the vertical direction, and a latticeform in which each lattice section is oriented vertically at a bottomend thereof and successively curves to change orientation horizontallyat a top end thereof.
 13. The combination according to claim 11, whereina cross-sectional area of the hollow state support measured in ahorizontal direction successively increases toward a lower side thereof.14. The combination according to claim 11, wherein thicknesses of thecolumnar bodies are uniform.
 15. The combination according to claim 11,wherein one of a flat surface and a curved surface for supporting aworkpiece is formed at a top end of the hollow state support.